Here's my initial take on last night's VP debate: ugh. I thought Sen. Biden was rather boring and simply had memorized countless Senate votes and procedural moves. If I wanted to know historical votes, I'd fire up the old Tivo recordings of C-SPAN. But, alas, I'm not having trouble sleeping at night, so I don't need to do that. Simply put: boring. I didn't get a clear picture of THE IDEA(s) that he and his team were pushing for America. As a long-time observer of politics, I know what his ideas are--and Obama's--but the case for them wasn't made to America. "A 12% reduction for those making $42,000 would yield a budgetary impact of $4,356,789,908, thus increasing GDP by 0.4%, blah, blah, blah..." does not present an argument for increasing the size or scope of the federal government.
Similarly, I thought Gov. Palin tended to retreat to safe sayings--"we need more oil." While I agree with the safe sayings, poll tested I'm sure, I don't think that it presents a clear case for why her ideas are right and Sen. Biden's are wrong. I assumed the MSM would tee off on that and declare how knowledgeable Sen. Biden was, and how unprepared Gov. Palin was. But as I review the papers today, I'm quite surprised by the MSM and independent voters' reactions. It seems, to summarize all the headlines, that Gov. Palin probably won on points, though not by knock out. It also seems that the race was handicapped by expectations. If it was an even match up--meaning, no preconceptions and expectations--then Sen. Biden won. But, given that MSM set Gov. Palin up as out of her league, her holding her own translated to most views as a win! Ahh, thank goodness for MSM bias!
In any event, I based my initial response on a big hope that the candidates always push the big IDEAS--not statistics or slogans. We have a fundamental disagreement in this country and it is not GOP v. Democrats. It has to do with individual equality and freedom. Here's the question for our time: Are all men created equal? If so, ought they to be free to choose their own way in this life, or should we appoint an enlightened class to guide them--and if we're equal, who are the 'enlightened ones'? If they are not equal, who do we pick for governmental leadership that will make the inferiors enjoy this life as much as the superiors?
It turns out, however, that the "idea debate" is not the debate the undecideds were interested in. Hence, the response to the debate this morning is decidedly more in favor of Gov. Palin than I had expected. To show this, you should watch the video below. It is a group of undecided voters reacting to the debate. It is hosted by Frank Luntz, who is a master of political language usage, and 'dial testing' voters to see how America reacts to political and commercial ads, speeches, and debates. He is brilliant, and I always learn a lot by listening to him. His conclusion based on his focus group, seen below, is that Gov. Palin exceeded expectations, connected with voters, and won the debate. He believes this debate will help Sen. McCain's lately dwindling poll numbers significantly.
Check out the room's response--keep in mind these are all undecided voters--to the question about who won.
Thomas More
[email protected]
Recent Comments